Home arrow Credit Issues arrow In The News arrow Debt Collectors Can Be Sued for Placing QR Codes on Envelopes - Third Circuit Court of Appeals
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
11082610 Visitors
Debt Collectors Can Be Sued for Placing QR Codes on Envelopes - Third Circuit Court of Appeals PDF Print E-mail

August 16, 2019 - The US Third Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that debt collectors who place QR (quick response) codes with unencrypted account information on the exterior of envelopes are violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). And that violation allows consumers to file suit. The ruling was issued by a three-judge panel on August 12th. 

Image Image

The ruling came as the result of a lawsuit filed by a woman in Philadelphia. Donna DiNaples received a letter from MRS BPO; a debt collector. The envelope included a QR code that was stamped on the exterior. When scanned with a smart phone, the code revealed her MRS account information. That information would clearly have violated the FDCPA had it been printed in plain English on the envelope, so DiNaples sued the company.

DiNaples prevailed in a lower court so MRS BPO appealed. The company argued that it would be illegal for anyone to scan an envelope while in the US Mail. The court determined that argument to be irrelevant. The fact that the QR code contained unencrypted information that could be read by any smart phone creates a privacy concern as well as an FDCPA violation.  

The ruling, which was unanimous, is the appeal's outcome and will likely end the case. Even if MRS appeals, it is highly likely that the Supreme Court would refuse to take the case.

by Jim Malmberg

Note: When posting a comment, please sign-in first if you want a response. If you are not registered, click here. Registration is easy and free.

 

Follow ACCESS
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
04/25/2024 12:59:56