Home arrow Privacy Issues arrow In The News arrow SCOTUS May Redefine Parameters for Warrantless Searches of Homes
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
9832574 Visitors
SCOTUS May Redefine Parameters for Warrantless Searches of Homes PDF Print E-mail

February 3, 2021 - The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees that people will be free from unwarranted government searches. But in 1973, the US Supreme Court found there was a "community caretaking" exception. To date, that exception has been largely been limited to vehicle searches. When a cop pulls you over, if he sees something illegal in your vehicle the car can be entirely searched in most states under the premise that you might be a danger to yourself of others. But a court in Massachusetts has now expanded the community caretaking exception to allow for the search of one's home without a warrant. And that court's decision will be reviewed at the US Supreme Court in March.

Image

Caniglia v. Strom is a case that involves guns and an argument between husband and wife. During the argument, Edward Caniglia pulled out an unloaded gun, set it on a table and said to his wife, "Why don’t you just shoot me and get me out of my misery." The next day, his wife reported him to authorities. He agreed to a mental evaluation at a local hospital and was released the same day. But while he was at the hospital, police when to his home and took his gun without a search warrant. Although Caniglia was never found guilty of anything and the people who examined him determined that he was not a threat, the gun was never returned to him so he sued.

So far, the courts have ruled against him.

This case is important to anyone concerned with privacy and government overreach. Caniglia's attorneys have made the point that using the same theory that the police used here, had he threatened to hang himself they could have justified a warrantless search to remove any rope they could find in the house. Allowing a warrantless search for any reason is a very slippery slope.

The case will be heard on March 24th. A ruling on it is likely to be handed down in late May or June.

by Jim Malmberg

Note: When posting a comment, please sign-in first if you want a response. If you are not registered, click here. Registration is easy and free.

Follow ACCESS  
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
05/18/2021 02:41:24