Home arrow Privacy Issues arrow In The News arrow New York Judge Orders Details of Secret Government Spy Program be Made Public
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
11688959 Visitors
New York Judge Orders Details of Secret Government Spy Program be Made Public PDF Print E-mail

March 19, 2015 – Here’s a riddle for you. What’s called a “Dirtbox” when it flies and a “Stingray” when it’s used on the ground? The answer is anything but funny. Dirtboxes and Stingrays are actually pieces of equipment that mimic cell phone towers, allowing police and the federal government to track just about anyone’s movements. 

Image

Dirtboxes became fairly well known about late last year when it was revealed that the federal government has been flying them all over the United States in an effort to track down suspects. But Stingrays were relatively unknown until the New York Times did an article on them a couple of weeks ago. And the details of the Stingray program are more than a little disturbing. The video from CNN below talks about both.

In the first place, Stingray casts a very wide net. When the device is used, it captures cell phone calls, data and text messages from every phone that it connects too; not just from phones of targeted suspects. The privacy implications of its use are staggering.

Secondly, Stingray appears to be in wide use by police departments around the country. Although the federal government has tried to keep those details quiet, since the Times article a number of police departments have admitted to using the equipment. In fact, in an interview on KNX News Radio in Los Angeles this morning, Chief Charlie Beck admitted that the Los Angeles Police Department uses it.  And documents obtained by the ACLU show that police departments in 20 states are now using it. Those records may not be complete however.

Beck stated that in every case in which Stingray is used, a court order is obtained first. But there are indications that this isn’t the case across the country. And according to a CNN article, the FBI has ordered local jurisdictions to release suspected criminals in cases that would have allowed details about how Stingrays work to become public.  But the cat may be out of the bag.

This week, NY Judge Patrick H. NeMoyer issued a court order to compel the sherrifs department in Erie, NY to release of their Stingray contract. These contracts are between Harris Corporation, the apparent manufacturer of Stingray, and each of the individual police departments which use the technology. Each of the contracts contains a binding nondisclosure provision that attempts to keep the details of both the contract and the Stingray devices secret. And each of the contracts is overseen by the FBI.

Judge NeMoyer’s order revealed that the FBI had intervened directly with local police departments using Stingray to get them to drop charges against suspect who learned that they had been apprehended using the technology. This is the first concrete evidence of the lengths to which the government is going to keep the program secret.

The Sheriff’s department had argued to keep the contract secret but because Stingray captures data from every phone that connects to it, the judge wouldn’t agree. He wrote, "If that is not an instruction that affects the public, nothing is."

The FBI and the Erie County Sherrif are planning on appealing the ruling.

Both Stingrays and Dirtboxes function by tricking cell phones. Any phone within range of one of these devices will think that the device is a cell phone tower and try to connect to it. As long as the cell phone is connected to it, the device captures all of the data being transmitted to or from the phone.

It appears that while public knowledge of these programs is new, the technology has been in use for at least seven years.

We’ll keep you posted as the ACLU case progresses. 

 

 byJim Malmberg

Note: When posting a comment, please sign-in first if you want a response. If you are not registered, click here. Registration is easy and free.

Follow me on Twitter:

 

Jim Malmberg has 8112 followers on Twitter

 

 

Follow ACCESS
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
05/14/2025 03:20:33