|
December 27, 2025 - When Congress passed the One Big Beautiful Bill and the president signed it into law, the promise was simple and politically potent: no federal income tax on tips, no federal income tax on overtime pay, and a new deduction for seniors meant to ease the pressure of rising costs in retirement. For millions of workers and retirees, it sounded like real relief. What many people did not realize, however, is that federal tax policy does not automatically carry over to the states.
Each state decides whether to follow federal tax law or to “decouple” from it. That technical choice has very real consequences. In states that conform to the new law, workers and seniors see the benefit at both the federal and state level. In states that do not, taxpayers get the federal break but still pay state income tax on the same income. The result is a patchwork system where identical workers in different states end up with very different tax bills.
A small group of states has chosen to fully align with the federal changes. Michigan stands out as the clearest example. Lawmakers there passed legislation to adopt the federal deductions for tips, overtime premiums, and the new senior deduction, making Michigan one of the few states where workers and retirees will see the full benefit Congress intended. Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, and South Carolina also generally conform to the new personal tax provisions under their existing tax codes.
Other states have taken a middle-road approach, adopting some parts of the federal law while rejecting others. Colorado allows the federal senior deduction but continues to tax overtime premium pay at the state level. Iowa and Oregon conform to the federal treatment of tips and overtime but do not allow the new senior deduction, meaning older residents in those states will still pay state tax on income the federal government now excludes.
Several large and influential states have gone further, choosing not to adopt the new worker and senior tax breaks at all. New York, California, and Illinois have all signaled that they will continue taxing tips and overtime income, citing concerns about lost revenue. Maine has explicitly rejected multiple provisions of the law, including the senior deduction, while Washington, D.C., moved quickly to decouple through emergency legislation, preserving local taxes on tips, overtime, and senior income.
The financial impact of these decisions is not abstract. It shows up directly on tax returns. A senior denied the new $6,000 deduction in a state with a six percent income tax will pay roughly $360 more in state taxes each year. In higher-tax jurisdictions, the added cost can exceed $500 annually for a single filer and double that for married couples. Tipped workers who qualify for the federal deduction but live in nonconforming states can owe hundreds of dollars more to their state governments, depending on their income and local tax rates. Overtime workers face similar outcomes, with states taxing the premium portion of overtime pay that Congress specifically chose to exempt.
Not everyone is affected. Residents of states with no state income tax on wages are largely insulated from the issue. Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming do not tax wage income, so whether they conform to the federal law is mostly irrelevant for workers earning tips or overtime. For seniors in those states, the federal deduction stands on its own.
Supporters of state decoupling argue that budgets matter and that adopting every federal tax change would force painful cuts elsewhere. Critics counter that these states are effectively advertising tax relief while quietly clawing it back at the local level, often from the same service workers and retirees politicians claim to champion. Treasury officials have urged states to conform, warning that noncompliance shifts the burden onto taxpayers who can least afford it.
The larger issue is clarity. Many taxpayers will assume that “no tax on tips” or “no tax on overtime” applies everywhere, only to discover at filing time that their state had other ideas. In those places, the promise of relief ends at the state line, and Scrooge is the one still collecting.
| State Treatment of BBB Tax Breaks (Current as Reported) |
|
State / Territory
|
Tips Exempt |
Overtime Exempt |
Senior Deduction |
Notes |
| Alabama |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Static conformity; no enabling law |
| Alaska |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
No state income tax |
| Arizona |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No legislative adoption |
| Arkansas |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No legislative adoption |
| California |
No |
No |
No |
State officials explicitly said they will not comply |
| Colorado |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Overtime premium explicitly excluded |
| Connecticut |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Delaware |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Florida |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
No state income tax |
| Georgia |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Rolling conformity excludes personal deductions |
| Hawaii |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Idaho |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Conforms |
| Illinois |
No |
No |
Not Adopted |
State leadership rejected worker exemptions |
| Indiana |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Iowa |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Senior deduction explicitly excluded |
| Kansas |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Kentucky |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Louisiana |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Maine |
No |
No |
No |
Explicitly rejected all three |
| Maryland |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Massachusetts |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Michigan |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Only state to fully legislate compliance |
| Minnesota |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Mississippi |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Missouri |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Montana |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Conforms |
| Nebraska |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Nevada |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
No state income tax |
| New Hampshire |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
No wage income tax |
| New Jersey |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| New York |
No |
No |
Not Adopted |
State declined to adopt worker exemptions |
| North Carolina |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| North Dakota |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Conforms |
| Ohio |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Oklahoma |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Oregon |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Senior deduction excluded |
| Pennsylvania |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Flat tax; no adoption legislation |
| Rhode Island |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| South Carolina |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Conforms |
| South Dakota |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
No state income tax |
| Tennessee |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
No wage income tax |
| Texas |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
No state income tax |
| Utah |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Vermont |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Virginia |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Washington |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
No wage income tax |
| Washington, D.C. |
No |
No |
No |
Emergency legislation decoupled |
| West Virginia |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Wisconsin |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
Not Adopted |
No adoption legislation |
| Wyoming |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
No state income tax |
|