Home arrow Politics & Politicians arrow Federal Issues arrow Scrooge States: When Federal Tax Relief Stops at the State Line
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
12129154 Visitors
Scrooge States: When Federal Tax Relief Stops at the State Line PDF Print E-mail
 
December 27, 2025 - When Congress passed the One Big Beautiful Bill and the president signed it into law, the promise was simple and politically potent: no federal income tax on tips, no federal income tax on overtime pay, and a new deduction for seniors meant to ease the pressure of rising costs in retirement. For millions of workers and retirees, it sounded like real relief. What many people did not realize, however, is that federal tax policy does not automatically carry over to the states.
Each state decides whether to follow federal tax law or to “decouple” from it. That technical choice has very real consequences. In states that conform to the new law, workers and seniors see the benefit at both the federal and state level. In states that do not, taxpayers get the federal break but still pay state income tax on the same income. The result is a patchwork system where identical workers in different states end up with very different tax bills.
 
A small group of states has chosen to fully align with the federal changes. Michigan stands out as the clearest example. Lawmakers there passed legislation to adopt the federal deductions for tips, overtime premiums, and the new senior deduction, making Michigan one of the few states where workers and retirees will see the full benefit Congress intended. Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, and South Carolina also generally conform to the new personal tax provisions under their existing tax codes.
 
Other states have taken a middle-road approach, adopting some parts of the federal law while rejecting others. Colorado allows the federal senior deduction but continues to tax overtime premium pay at the state level. Iowa and Oregon conform to the federal treatment of tips and overtime but do not allow the new senior deduction, meaning older residents in those states will still pay state tax on income the federal government now excludes.
 
Several large and influential states have gone further, choosing not to adopt the new worker and senior tax breaks at all. New York, California, and Illinois have all signaled that they will continue taxing tips and overtime income, citing concerns about lost revenue. Maine has explicitly rejected multiple provisions of the law, including the senior deduction, while Washington, D.C., moved quickly to decouple through emergency legislation, preserving local taxes on tips, overtime, and senior income.
 
The financial impact of these decisions is not abstract. It shows up directly on tax returns. A senior denied the new $6,000 deduction in a state with a six percent income tax will pay roughly $360 more in state taxes each year. In higher-tax jurisdictions, the added cost can exceed $500 annually for a single filer and double that for married couples. Tipped workers who qualify for the federal deduction but live in nonconforming states can owe hundreds of dollars more to their state governments, depending on their income and local tax rates. Overtime workers face similar outcomes, with states taxing the premium portion of overtime pay that Congress specifically chose to exempt.
 
Not everyone is affected. Residents of states with no state income tax on wages are largely insulated from the issue. Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming do not tax wage income, so whether they conform to the federal law is mostly irrelevant for workers earning tips or overtime. For seniors in those states, the federal deduction stands on its own.
 
Supporters of state decoupling argue that budgets matter and that adopting every federal tax change would force painful cuts elsewhere. Critics counter that these states are effectively advertising tax relief while quietly clawing it back at the local level, often from the same service workers and retirees politicians claim to champion. Treasury officials have urged states to conform, warning that noncompliance shifts the burden onto taxpayers who can least afford it.
 

The larger issue is clarity. Many taxpayers will assume that “no tax on tips” or “no tax on overtime” applies everywhere, only to discover at filing time that their state had other ideas. In those places, the promise of relief ends at the state line, and Scrooge is the one still collecting. 

State Treatment of BBB Tax Breaks (Current as Reported)
State / Territory
Tips Exempt Overtime Exempt Senior Deduction Notes
Alabama Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted Static conformity; no enabling law
Alaska N/A N/A N/A No state income tax
Arizona Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No legislative adoption
Arkansas Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No legislative adoption
California No No No State officials explicitly said they will not comply
Colorado Yes No Yes Overtime premium explicitly excluded
Connecticut Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Delaware Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Florida N/A N/A N/A No state income tax
Georgia Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted Rolling conformity excludes personal deductions
Hawaii Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Idaho Yes Yes Yes Conforms
Illinois No No Not Adopted State leadership rejected worker exemptions
Indiana Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Iowa Yes Yes No Senior deduction explicitly excluded
Kansas Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Kentucky Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Louisiana Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Maine No No No Explicitly rejected all three
Maryland Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Massachusetts Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Michigan Yes Yes Yes Only state to fully legislate compliance
Minnesota Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Mississippi Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Missouri Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Montana Yes Yes Yes Conforms
Nebraska Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Nevada N/A N/A N/A No state income tax
New Hampshire N/A N/A N/A No wage income tax
New Jersey Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
New York No No Not Adopted State declined to adopt worker exemptions
North Carolina Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
North Dakota Yes Yes Yes Conforms
Ohio Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Oklahoma Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Oregon Yes Yes No Senior deduction excluded
Pennsylvania Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted Flat tax; no adoption legislation
Rhode Island Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
South Carolina Yes Yes Yes Conforms
South Dakota N/A N/A N/A No state income tax
Tennessee N/A N/A N/A No wage income tax
Texas N/A N/A N/A No state income tax
Utah Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Vermont Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Virginia Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Washington N/A N/A N/A No wage income tax
Washington, D.C. No No No Emergency legislation decoupled
West Virginia Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Wisconsin Not Adopted Not Adopted Not Adopted No adoption legislation
Wyoming N/A N/A N/A No state income tax
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
12/29/2025 02:28:27