Home arrow Privacy Issues arrow In The News arrow Michigan Supreme Court to Review Use of Drone Searches Without a Search Warrant
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
12462070 Visitors
Michigan Supreme Court to Review Use of Drone Searches Without a Search Warrant PDF Print E-mail

June 16, 2023 - Todd Maxon owns 5 acres of land in Long Lake Township, Michigan. He uses the property to store a variety of older vehicles, which he is working to restore. All of the vehicles are parked out of public view, and what he does out of public view is really nobody's business. Unfortunately for Maxon, the township's zoning commission doesn't see it that way and they have been in a long running zoning dispute with him. And as a part of that dispute, they used drones to search his property repeatedly without ever obtaining a search warrant. Michigan's Supreme Court has now agreed to take a look at those searches and determine if they are actually legal.

Image

Maxon's run-ins with the township zoning authorities began in 2007. That's when the town sued him for a zoning violation and they lost. The township was forced to drop the suit and cover all of his legal fees. But that didn't end the dispute. Eventually, the town decided to use a drone to fly over his property and photograph it, looking for zoning violations. The drone flights happened repeatedly over a two-year period of time and the pictures taken by the drone were used in a court case which Maxon lost.

The court actually determined that even if the flights and the pictures they gathered had be obtained unconstitutionally, they could still be used against Maxon for purposes of civil code enforcement. But Maxon's attorneys - working for the Institute for Justice - appealed that ruling and now Michigan's high court will weigh in.

What the township did to Maxon is a pretty clear violation of the 4th Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches. Whether or not the Michigan Supreme Court will see it that way is still to be determined. But if they don't rule in favor of Maxon, the case could move to federal court. The case will be taken up in the court's next term. A trial date has not been set yet.

Note: When posting a comment, please sign-in first if you want a response. If you are not registered, click here. Registration is easy and free.

Follow ACCESS  
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
06/09/2026 11:32:11